Get the Books
Enjoying these notebooks and want to support the work? Check out the practical books on Data Science, Visualisation, and Evolutionary Algorithms.
Get the booksPairwise Comparison Example
Pairwise Comparison¶
Pairwise comparison of data-sets is very important. It allows us to compare two sets of data and decide whether:
- one is better than the other,
- one has more of some feature than the other,
- the two sets are significantly different or not.
In the context of the weather data that you've been working with, we could test the following hypotheses:
- Hypothesis 1: The mean temperature in China is greater than the mean temperature in Japan
- Hypothesis 2: The mean humidity in Russia is greater than the mean humidity in Spain
There are many tests for rejecting the null hypothesis (that there is no difference between the two data-sets), which one you use depends on the properties of your data-set. Below is a brief list of some of the available tests:
Parametric | Non-parametric |
---|---|
Paired t-test | Wilcoxon signed-rank test |
Unpaired t-test | Mann-Whitney U test |
Pearson correlation | Spearman correlation |
... | ... |
You can see they've been divided into two groups, parametric tests and non-parametric tests. Which group you use again depends on the properties of your data-set, in this case it's whether your data-sets follow a specific distribution. Typically, if your data-set doesn't follow a specific distribution, you want to use a non-parametric test. These tests don't make any assumptions about the distribution of your data.
Before we move onto running any of these tests - we need to determine a sufficient sample size. This is because we cannot make a reliable judgement if, for example, we only compare 4 temperature readings from Japan to 4 from China. The mean temperature of both countries may be the same - but was there enough data to make this claim?
Sample Size Sufficiency¶
Let's get straight into it! We will be using numpy
, matplotlib.pyplot
, and pandas
, so make sure to import these in the following cell. I've imported numpy
for you. If you have access to it, I recommend also importing seaborn
which automatically improves the quality of your plots. You may not have this in your labs so feel free to comment it out.
%matplotlib inline
# imports here
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
Now we want to load in our data-set from the CSV file. You can use the pd.read_csv()
function. You will also need to add the following column names:
wt.columns = ['time', 'country', 'humidity', 'pressure', 'temp', 'max_temp', 'min_temp']
# load data into variable 'wt' here
wt = pd.read_csv("weather.csv", names=['time', 'country', 'humidity', 'pressure', 'temp', 'max_temp', 'min_temp'])
# output a sample of the data for inspection...
wt.head()
Let's check the sample size sufficiency for Hypothesis 1, for this we will need to pick out the temperatures for China and Japan, let's store them in variables named temp_JP
and temp_CN
respectively.
# variables holding the temperatures for Japan and China
temp_JP = wt[wt.country=='JP'].temp
temp_CN = wt[wt.country=='CN'].temp
So we have an idea of the number of samples for each data-set, let's print out the number of samples for inspection. There are man ways to do this, using .count()
, .size
, .shape
, etc.
# print out the number of samples for inspection
print "number of temperature samples for Japan: {}".format(temp_JP.count())
print "number of temperature samples for China: {}".format(temp_CN.count())
Next, let's store the mean of temp_JP
and temp_CN
in variables named temp_JP_mean
and temp_CN_mean
respectively
# variables holding the mean temperature for Japan and China
temp_JP_mean = temp_JP.mean()
temp_CN_mean = temp_CN.mean()
# print out the means for inspection
print "mean temperature in Japan: {}".format(temp_JP_mean)
print "mean temperature in China: {}".format(temp_CN_mean)
It may be tempting at this point to state that the temperature in China is typically warmer than the temperature in Japan. But this could simply be by chance! We must be confident that we can make this claim with some statistical significance.
Now that we have the data-sets and their means, we can have a look at the relationship between sample sizes and the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM). The formula for this is:
$$SE_{M} = \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}$$We will implement this for all our possible sample sizes for Japan, and then China below.
SEM = []
for sample_size in range(3,len(temp_JP)):
sample = temp_JP[0:sample_size]
SEM.append(sample.std() / np.sqrt(sample_size))
plt.plot(SEM, color='magenta')
plt.plot(200,SEM[200], marker='o', color='cyan')
plt.ylabel("Standard Error of the Mean ($SE_M$)")
plt.xlabel("Sample size $(n)$")
plt.title("Relationship between $SE_M$ and $n$");
SEM = []
for sample_size in range(3,len(temp_CN)):
sample = temp_CN[0:sample_size]
SEM.append(sample.std() / np.sqrt(sample_size))
plt.plot(SEM, color='magenta')
plt.plot(200,SEM[200], marker='o', color='cyan')
plt.ylabel("Standard Error of the Mean ($SE_M$)")
plt.xlabel("Sample size $(n)$")
plt.title("Relationship between $SE_M$ and $n$");
In the two figures above we can see that we have selected sufficient sample sizes of 200 for Japan and China. This decision has been made visually based on the dispersion of the samples. There are many ways of doing this, but let's move onto using these samples to test our hypothesis!
First, let's import scipy
# imports here
from scipy import stats
Now let's check to see if our data-sets are normally distributed, so we know whether to use parametric or non-parametric tests to compare them. For this we will use the typical alpha, $\alpha = 0.05$, as the cut-off for significance.
Let's start with Japan.
s, p = stats.normaltest(temp_JP) # p = p-value
if p < 0.05:
print 'JP temperature data is not normal'
else:
print 'JP temperature data is normal'
Now let's check China.
s, p = stats.normaltest(temp_CN) # p = p-value
if p < 0.05:
print 'CN temperature data is not normal'
else:
print 'CN temperature data is normal'
Let's plot the normalised histograms for the temperatures in Japan and China to look at this visually.
# plot histograms for temp_JP and temp_CN, make sure to set normed to True!
temp_JP.hist(color='magenta', normed=True);
temp_CN.hist(color='cyan', alpha=0.5, normed=True);
Our data is supposedly not following a normal distribution, so we may decide to use a non-parametric test. There is much to consider when selecting a test to use, but we will use the Wilcoxon-signed rank test.
Using scipy.stats.wilcoxon, conduct a pairwise comparison of temperatures from Japan to temperatures from China to see if the null hypothesis is rejected.
s, p = stats.wilcoxon(temp_JP[0:200], temp_CN[0:200])
if p < 0.05:
print 'null hypothesis rejected, significant difference between the data-sets'
else:
print 'null hypothesis accepted, no significant difference between the data-sets'
Now, let's use a quick if
statement to resolve whether the temperature in our China sample is greater than our Japan sample. We can make this claim now that we have checked the significance of our results.
if(temp_CN[0:200].mean() > temp_JP[0:200].mean()):
print "Hypothesis 1 accepted, it is warmer in China"
else:
print "Hypothesis 1 rejected, it is warmer in Japan"
Extras¶
- Copy this notebook and try testing Hypothesis 2, make sure your decision to use parametric or non-parametric testing is justified.
- Check out the real-time plotting below.
from IPython.display import display, clear_output
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(1, 1, 1)
for i in range(200):
x = range(0,i);
y = SEM[0:i]
ax.cla()
ax.plot(x, y)
plt.ylabel("Standard Error of the Mean ($SE_M$)")
plt.xlabel("Sample size $(n)$")
plt.title("Relationship between $SE_M$ and $n$");
display(fig)
clear_output(wait = True)
plt.pause(0.1)
Support this work
You can support this work by getting the e-books. This notebook will always be available for free in its online format.
Plotapi, beautiful by default.
Let plotapi do the heavy lifting – enabling beautiful interactive visualisations with a single line of code (instead of hundreds).
Get Plotapi